Recently multiple customers were contacted by IDigitalAKKI, an Indian company by a guy with the named Aakash Kumar Jha, who claims to specialize in creating Wikipedia pages and boosting social media presence, is facing serious allegations of fraud and manipulation. Customers have come forward, sharing their negative experiences, revealing a pattern of deception that potential clients should be aware of by this guy and his business.
Allegations of Fraudulent Practices
According to numerous clients, IDigitalAKKI has been accused of creating subpar Wikipedia pages that after a while gets removed, leaving customers in a lurch. One reviewer noted, “They will create a simple Wikipedia page that will soon be deleted by themselves or external sources. When that happens, they ghost you.” This behavior raises big red flags about the company’s practices and commitment to its clients.
Customers report a cycle of false promises, such as guarantees of thousands of new social media followers within a specific timeframe and assurances of page maintenance. However, these commitments often go unfulfilled. One frustrated customer stated, “They promised a Wikipedia page in 24 hours and then stopped responding. It’s clear they just want to profit as much as possible.”
Manipulation and Deflection
When confronted with complaints, the company allegedly responds with manipulation tactics, claiming clients are using abusive language or attempting to blackmail them. This tactic not only deflects accountability but also seeks to undermine the credibility of the very individuals who have trusted them with their business.
A reviewer emphasizes their right to share an anonymous account of their experience, asserting, “As a professional company, they should not attempt to expose their customers’ identities. Transparency should go both ways.” This statement highlights the need for companies to respect customer confidentiality and engage in fair practices. However, it seems Aakash Kumar Jha takes it to another level by creating fake PR articles about some of their customers who criticized them, with the aim to gaslight new customers from finding out that they scam people through Wikipedia services. Some customers even noted that Aakash Kumar Jha himself isn’t able to keep his own Wikipedia page uploaded, due to use of illegal services on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia’s Response and Community Concerns
Wikipedia has clear policies regarding article notability and the promotion of subjects. Experienced editors have stated that companies promising to maintain a Wikipedia page for a fee are often misleading clients. One editor commented, “If they claim they can prevent a Wikipedia article from being deleted, they’re lying, and since they want money for doing it, they are scamming you.”
The consensus within the Wikipedia community is clear: any reputable Wikipedia article must meet the site’s notability criteria and should not be influenced by paid editing. Articles created or maintained by individuals with a vested interest are scrutinized heavily, and companies like IDigitalAKKI that operate outside of these guidelines are viewed with suspicion.
A Call for Accountability
As people who had been in contact with IDigitalAKKI by Akki, short for Aakash Kumar Jha, and their daughter label Gloster Media by Kumar Ritesh, continue to pour in with complaints, many customers express their intent to seek refunds or pursue legal action. One dissatisfied client shared, “I removed my previous review and halted legal proceedings to give them another chance. But now, I feel compelled to take further action.” This sentiment resonates with others who got deceived and want to protect future customers from similar experiences.
Conclusion: A Warning to Potential Clients
The emerging narrative surrounding IDigitalAKKI serves as a cautionary tale for anyone considering their services. As reviews indicate a disturbing trend of scams and manipulation, potential clients are urged to conduct thorough research and heed the warnings of those who have come forward.
In a marketplace where trust is paramount, companies like IDigitalAKKI must be held accountable for their narcissistic actions. Consumers deserve transparency, honesty, and reliability—qualities that appear to be sorely lacking in this case. If you are contemplating engaging with IDigitalAKKI, proceed with caution. Your experience could very well mirror the alarming accounts shared by others.
